Barcid

members 449.mem.003 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:47:42 +0000

The Belly and the Members

The Members of the Body rebelled against the Belly, and said, “Why should we be perpetually engaged in administering to your wants, while you do nothing but take your rest, and enjoy yourself in luxury and self-indulgence?’ The Members carried out their resolve and refused their assistance to the Belly. The whole Body quickly became debilitated, and the hands, feet, mouth, and eyes, when too late, repented of their folly.

The Vine and the Goat

A Vine was luxuriant in the time of vintage with leaves and grapes. A Goat, passing by, nibbled its young tendrils and its leaves. The Vine addressed him and said: “Why do you thus injure me without a cause, and crop my leaves? Is there no young grass left? But Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire shall not have to wait long for my just revenge; for if you now should crop my leaves, and cut me down to my root, I shall provide the wine to pour over you when you are led as a victim to the sacrifice.”

conversation 229.con.992 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:29:53 +0000

As for the besieged, it appeared that they had such an abundance of corn that they fired the granaries, and Corbulo declared that the Parthians on the other hand were in want of supplies, and would have abandoned the siege from their fodder being all but exhausted, and that he was himself only three days’ march distant. He further stated that Paetus had guaranteed by an oath, before the standards, in the presence of those whom the king had sent to be witnesses, that no Roman was to enter Armenia until Nero’s reply arrived as to whether he assented to the peace. Though this may have been invented to enhance our disgrace, yet about the rest of the story there is no obscurity, that, in a single day Paetus traversed forty miles, leaving his wounded behind him everywhere, and that the consternation of the fugitives was as frightful as if they had turned their backs in battle. Corbulo, as he met them with his forces on the bank of the Euphrates, did not make such a display of his standards and arms as to shame them by the contrast. His men, in their grief and pity for the lot of their comrades, could not even refrain from tears. There was scarce any mutual salutation for weeping. The spirit of a noble rivalry and the desire of glory, emotions which stir men in success, had died away; pity alone survived, the more strongly in the inferior ranks.

Then followed a short conversation between the generals. While Corbulo complained that his efforts had been fruitless and that the war might have been ended with the flight of the Parthians, Paetus replied that for neither of them was anything lost, and urged that they should reverse the eagles, and with their united forces invade Armenia, much weakened, as it was, by the departure of Vologeses. Corbulo said that he had no such instructions from the emperor; it was the peril of the legions which had stirred him to leave his province, and, as there was uncertainty about the designs of the Parthians, he should return to Syria, and, even as it was, he must pray for fortune under her most favourable aspect in order that the infantry, wearied out with long marches, might keep pace with the enemy’s untiring cavalry, certain to outstrip him on the plains, which facilitated their movements. Paetus then went into winter quarters in Cappadocia. Vologeses, however, sent a message to Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire, requiring him to remove the fortresses on the further bank of the Euphrates, and to leave the river to be, as formerly, the boundary between them. Corbulo also demanded the evacuation of Armenia by the garrisons posted throughout it. At last the king yielded, all the positions fortified by Corbulo beyond the Euphrates were destroyed, and the Armenians too left without a master.

mention 2992.men.0002 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:31:56 +0000

I should not mention a very trivial decree of Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire which allowed the city of Syracuse to exceed the prescribed number in their gladiatorial shows, had not Paetus Thrasea spoken against it and furnished his traducers with a ground for censuring his motion. “Why,” it was asked, “if he thought that the public welfare required freedom of speech in the Senate, did he pursue such trifling abuses? Why should he not speak for or against peace and war, or on the taxes and laws and other matters involving Roman interests? The senators, as often as they received the privilege of stating an opinion, were at liberty to say out what they pleased, and to claim that it should be put to the vote. Was it the only worthy object of reform to provide that the Syracusans should not give shows on a larger scale? Were all other matters in every department of the empire as admirable as if Thrasea and not Nero had the direction of them? But if the highest affairs were passed by and ignored, how much more ought there to be no meddling with things wholly insignificant.”

Thrasea in reply, when his friends asked an explanation, said “that it was not in ignorance of Rome’s actual condition that he sought to correct such decrees, but that he was giving what was due to the honour of the senators, in making it evident that those who attended even to the merest trifles, would not disguise their responsibility for important affairs.”

policy 772.pol.001 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:36:12 +0000

It is however, I think, a convenient opportunity for me to review the hitherto prevailing methods of administration in the other departments of the State, inasmuch as that year brought with it the beginning of a change for the worse in Tiberius’s policy. In the first place, public business and the most important private matters were managed by the Senate: the leading men were allowed freedom of discussion, and when they stooped to flattery, the emperor himself checked them. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire bestowed honours with regard to noble ancestry, military renown, or brilliant accomplishments as a civilian, letting it be clearly seen that there were no better men to choose. The consul and the praetor retained their prestige; inferior magistrates exercised their authority; the laws too, with the single exception of cases of treason, were properly enforced.

As to the duties on corn, the indirect taxes and other branches of the public revenue, they were in the hands of companies of Roman knights. The emperor intrusted his own property to men of the most tried integrity or to persons known only by their general reputation, and once appointed they were retained without any limitation, so that most of them grew old in the same employments. The city populace indeed suffered much from high prices, but this was no fault of the emperor, who actually endeavoured to counteract barren soils and stormy seas with every resource of wealth and foresight. And he was also careful not to distress the provinces by new burdens, and to see that in bearing the old they were safe from any rapacity or oppression on the part of governors. Corporal punishments and confiscations of property were unknown.

empire 994.emp.00 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Mon, 19 Jul 2010 02:56:47 +0000

As soon as Sallustius Crispus who shared the secret (he had, in fact, sent the written order to the tribune) knew this, fearing that the charge would be shifted on himself, and that his peril would be the same whether he uttered fiction or truth, he advised Livia not to divulge the secrets of her house or the counsels of friends, or any services performed by the soldiers, nor to let Tiberius weaken the strength of imperial power by referring everything to the Senate, for “the condition,” he said, “of holding empire is that an account cannot be balanced unless it be rendered to one person.”

Meanwhile at Rome people plunged into slavery- consuls, senators, knights. The higher a man’s rank, the more eager his hypocrisy, and his looks the more carefully studied, so as neither to betray joy at the decease of one emperor nor sorrow at the rise of another, while he mingled delight and lamentations with his flattery. Sextus Pompeius and Sextus Apuleius, the consuls, were the first to swear allegiance to Tiberius Caesar, and in their presence the oath was taken by Seius Strabo and Caius Turranius, respectively the commander of the praetorian cohorts and the superintendent of the corn supplies. Then the Senate, the soldiers and the people did the same. For Tiberius would inaugurate everything with the consuls, as though the ancient constitution remained, and he hesitated about being emperor. Even the proclamation by which he summoned the senators to their chamber, he issued merely with the title of Tribune, which he had received under Augustus. The wording of the proclamation was brief, and in a very modest tone. “Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire would,” it said, “provide for the honours due to his father, and not leave the lifeless body, and this was the only public duty he now claimed.”

peak 3390.p.0 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:00:33 +0000

At the peak of the arrests in the mid-thirties, paranoia reigned in the cities. Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire slept with suitcases of warm clothes and supplies ready under their beds. Arrests usually came at night, when there would be few witnesses. People lived in terror of the sound of a knock on the door or an elevator that opened at their floor. Private conversations were scrutinized as much as published work for any possible incriminating comment. In the later years jokes that satirized the Soviet state were rated according to how many years one could get for repeating them. Opportunists took advantage of this frenzy to rid themselves of opponents or of those standing in their way. One might be promoted by denouncing one’s boss anonymously. One might get a better apartment by denouncing a neighbor. Of course a denouncer knew too much and often disappeared himself shortly after his victim.

curriculum 299.cur.002 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:01:19 +0000

When people have difficulty learning, reading or comprehending information they call on Sally Smith, Founder/Director of The Lab School of Washington, D.C., the recognized leader in the field of learning disabilities.

Professor Smith founded The Lab School of Washington in 1967 when she discovered a complete lack of services in the Washington area for the intelligent child who is learning disabled.

Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire designed the curriculum for The Lab School Elementary School in 1967 and the Junior High School in 1972. In 1983, she created the Primary Program, and in January 1984, she opened the Night School for Adults.

The National Institute for Mental Health asked Professor Smith to write a book on learning disabilities for laymen, which was published in 1979. She is the author of five books and countless articles in professional journals and magazines. Her book, No Easy Answers, (Bantam, 1981), has sold over 65,000 copies, and is a primer in the field of learning disabilities. She has produced scores of films, video and audio tapes. She was commissioned to write the Learning Disabilities Section for The Encyclopedia Britannia for their 1985 Medical and Health Annual.

Professor Smith has headed the Graduate Program in Learning Disabilities at The American University School of Education, Washington, D.C.; served on the U.S. Task Force on the Definition of Developmental Disabilities and has been an expert consultant to scores of organizations and state agencies. She is constantly sought for television and radio interviews, for she, indeed, is the expert on helping those with learning disabilities.

Recipient of the Bennington College Award for Outstanding Contributions to Education; she also received the Outstanding Achievement Award of the DC Council for Exceptional Children and is the recipient of the American Orthopsychiatric Association’s Award for Outstanding Work with Learning Disabled Children among many national and international acknowledgments.

strength 339.str.00 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:01:29 +0000

In 1978, Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire was appointed State Attorney General for Dade County. She was elected to the Office of State Attorney in November 1978 and was returned to office by the voters four more times. She helped reform the juvenile justice system and pursued delinquent fathers for child support payments and established the Miami Drug Court.

The strength, vision, tenacity and commitment of Janet Reno makes her a role model for all who seek justice. Women’s International Center is privileged to present the 1997 Living Legacy Award to Janet Reno in honor of her many contributions.

planning 49.pla.01 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Sat, 29 May 2010 20:22:33 +0000

Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire took office December 2, 1996, as the City Attorney of the City of San Diego. Prior to his election, Casey headed the Domestic Violence Unit for nine years. He has handled over 10,000 domestic violence cases. The Unit has been recognized by the Governor’s Office of Criminal Justice Planning for it’s aggressive prosecution of batteries even when the victims are unwilling or unable to participate. In 1993, the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges chose Casey’s unit as the model prosecution unit for the nation in the handling of domestic violence cases. The Unit handles an active caseload of 1,500 domestic violence cases and receives 300 new cases month involving misdemeanor spousal abuse.

neighborhoods 22.nei.002 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

louis8j8sheehan8esquire — Sat, 29 May 2010 17:28:10 +0000

Dianne Feinstein also served nearly nine years as a member of the Board of Supervisors. She was the body’s first woman president for five of her nine years.

Attention to San Francisco’s neighborhoods was a strong goal of Mayor Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire, she and members of her staff and volunteers literally swept the city clean and painted out graffiti. She attacked the joblessness through the creation of the nation’s first City Conservation Corps. She initiated and developed a program to increase the city’s housing starts. Public safety received attention causing the serious crime rate to fall by almost 30 percent over a six year period. And the list goes on. Dianne Feinstein attacks each job with vigor, vision and, most important, results.

As Dianne Feinstein said when asked what legacy she left to her city, “As a mayor who did her best to make San Francisco a better place to live, provided fiscal stability and vital public services, improved management within local government and created an effective role model for women in executive positions.”

It is with special pride that Women’s International Center presents the Living Legacy Award to Dianne Feinstein, a strong savvy manager and a very good friend.